Definitions of Pseudoscience


I thought I’d post these here. In actual scientific studies, there is a lot of very precise methodology, that truly matters in the long term. For the sake of my ramblings, they have not been “proven” as anything, and I will make it obvious (if only to cover my bases, srry but srsly) that none of the things I have yet said are something I claim to be science, at least, not yet. Mostly they contain bits of google-worthy science and things I’ve learned in my classes, and a crap ton of sass. But you get what you get, and that’s what I’ve got so far. I’m pretty sure that knowing some of these things (even if it’s selfish as hell) would provide me a decent enough framework to adequately pace myself, and replicate this kind of analysis on an TBD list of anything. If not, we’re going to find out. But you guys, this is how research is done. You do your best, and you revise constantly. It’s basically life as we know it, but measured.




Published by


I am a teacher-to-be who loves people. I am not afraid of many things. I like to explain my thoughts logically on a very birds-eye view level--I was born thinking that way. I follow Jesus Christ, and I accept only that label to describe my identity--that I am a child of God, as are infinite others, regardless of their other identities. Christ is my one thing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s